Topic for Today. Things that are recent.
Now for a few recent things in my uh- before death thing- uh- life? Life! Yeah! Uh- Okay No longer have a job, the pizza place I was working at for the past two years went out of business. That's bad.
I will be starting to take Production Art at Winnipeg Tech in September, which would have probably forced me to have to quit that job anyways. That's good.
I saw finally saw The Dark Knight the other day. Now normally this is where I would go into a long dissertation, long for any film probably twice the length for a Batman film and probably three times the length for a film of it's notoriety, but I will refrain at least for the time being. As my thoughts need time to percolate. Though I will say this this actually felt like a Batman movie, as compared to Batman Begins which felt like Christian Bale giving me the finger. The Dark Knight makes Batman Begins look like MOTHER FUCKING SHIT! And it already looked like FUCKING SHIT! So that's good.
Brief overview:
Direction: Overall=Tighter, less shooting of conversations the exact same way over and over again. Action=Not the apex of action direction, basically point the camera at the crashes and stuff blowing up, no fancy moves, or editing, but they weren't necessary. From this Nolan has a better understanding of action and more importantly fight scenes as you can actually see what the fuck is happening. Pacing=Much improved over the first.
Music: Less bombast compared to Begins, several simple increasing in intensity pieces at key moments work like gangbusters, especially during The Joker's 'Why So Serious?' speech.
Script:Perfect.
(Okay this is turning into a big thing anyways I might as well continue)
Acting:The usual suspects return (except for Katie Holmes) along with some new faces. Freeman, Caine and Oldman could use half of the effort they use here and still be great. Simple as that.
Maggie Gyllenhaal replaces Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes as does a good job with a fairly simple character. I didn't see the problem that others did with Holmes in the first, simply because she is younger and looks it, compared to the other veteran players in the ensemble, I guess this was misconstrued as naivety or inexperience by comparison, but had they carried her over to The Dark Knight she would've done fine and helped preserve a greater sense of continuity. Not that Maggie is bad just there was no real reason to not get Holmes back.
Aaron Eckhart is the man who would be two as Gotham D.A. Harvey Dent. Eckhart is a good actor. On occasions I have often thought of him as bland, simply because he often plays characters that he's played before. He doesn't take chances. Here he breaks that chain by showing a good man broken down, physically and emotionally reduced to the motivation of revenge. A mirror image of Batman's own journey taken to the next darker level. I have heard others state that when considered closer the central character of the film is Harvey Dent, this is true to a degree but more screen time in the final product would help to solidify this. That would not have been a shame. Eckhart needs to take more risks like this.
You expect me to end with Heath Ledger, that's exactly why I'm not. (I'll try not to get too personal here but with The Joker it might be hard.) From the opening scene to the final battle with the Joker, you get a sense that Ledger did his homework and did it well. "The Joker's schemes make sense only to him.", this mentality is brought into the fictional-real world of Gotham by making The Joker an agent of chaos, a terrorist with no country and no goal but to make people burn, bleed, die and the rest of them watch and fear the results. Ledger's Joker is dirty and gritty, with no past and no future he simply appears as a force of nature, to do whatever pops into his head, whenever he pleases. Ledger fills The Joker with a simmering rage that is only every so often shown, he's in control of his insanity so to speak, he doesn't seem to truly get 'angry'. Ledger brings the character to a level of brutal, psychotic, narcissistic craziness that should rightly belong in an R-Rated film but somehow was allowed to run free in this one. Ledger's performance is magnetizing, you miss him when he's not on screen. Ledger was a good actor, never had a problem with him but never did I think he could pull something like this off. RIP Dude.
Now we come to one of the main sources of frustration in Batman Begins. Batman himself (supposedly) Christian Bale. I've said it before and I will say it again, Bale is an outstanding actor. However in Begins, I never connected with him as either aspect of this character and therefore was without an anchor in the film. (Other things about Begins piss me off but we are talking about Bale at the moment) In The Dark Knight, thankfully Batman's and Bruce Wayne's screen time has been considerably cut down. Batman has less dialogue and because of that is more intimidating, but on the bad side he still sounds like he's been smoking since he was a fetus. There's no chance that's going away but still I appeal to you Nolan, cut that shit out. It sucks, it's annoying, and worst of all sometimes it's funny when it's not supposed to be. All things considered Bale didn't piss me off much in this one, maybe because I went in knowing that he'd be there no matter what and just forced myself to deal with it. That and maybe I was a little used to him in that role, but he did seem more at ease here less of a NyQuil drinking disinterested douchebag.
Anyhow, Begins is a source of ongoing friction with me and at least one of my close counterparts because it's a film about one of our favourite characters and by all rights we should like it and for whatever reason it just doesn't click. After seeing The Dark Knight I would be perfectly happy had it been the first movie and Begins simply never made. Though The Joker alone made this movie basically, had that not worked and there had been more shitty Batman shitty shit, I don't think I would've liked it as much as I did but as it stands, The Dark Knight 10/10
(I still can't believe that to come from utter shit to 10 out of 10. Jesus)
Keaton is still the best live action Batman. Hands fucking down.
(Now let's finally make Batman vs Superman using Andrew Kevin Walker's 'Asylum' script, bring back Keaton for Batman!)
Whoa that was bigger than what I was expecting. I had planned on doing a quick overview of The Dark Knight and then gone into greater detail on Tropic Thunder, but I might as well go the other way around now.
Tropic Thunder
Ben Stiller's best movie since Mystery Men. (I'm not counting a lot of stuff because I either haven't seen it or it was shit. Zoolander is in the shit category if you are wondering. Also if you like Zoolander that's fine, but if you love Zoolander you should go to South Korea and try to run across the DMZ because you are stupid and deserve to die in a land you are not familiar with where no one knows you or cares about your death.)
Co-written, directed, produced by and starring Ben Stiller, Jack Black and Robert Downey Jr, among others.
A great parody of movie stars, the celebrity life style and war movies. I have heard people complain that it isn't funny or whatever. I will tell you this, it is funny, but I guess certain mother fuckers have been corrupted by Family Guy or general idiocy and unless there's a joke every 2.6 seconds a movie isn't funny. You know what go fuck yourself with your Family Guy Season 5 DVD set, you fucking assholes. Some of the funny bashes you over the head, some of it tickles you lightly. I can definitely see catching more from this pitcher on a few more viewings.
You may have heard of a certain cameo and from my perspective it does not disappoint, it's fucking weird and hilarious all at the same time.
Stiller plays his action movie star character as a less pathetic version of the character we've seen him do many times before, basically playing himself. Not a bad performance but- Y'know. He holds it together. All depends on how much you like him. Great scene where he's taken prisoner and he and his captors are doing the whole spit in the face of the enemy thing, and it just keeps going to an unnecessary level.
Jack Black keeps himself to himself, playing a fucked up mix of David Spade, Eddie Murphy and Andy Dyck. If you don't like Jack Black (like me) you will be able to tolerate him here. "No you can't have any fucking jellybeans!"
And we come to Robert Downey Jr, hilarious as fucking usual. You can either get stuck on the fact that his character is in 'blackface' or go with it as a case of his character is an insane method actor who takes his job a little too seriously and it's hilarious kinda thing. He's not playing a black dude okay. He's a dude playin' a dude disguised as another dude! Fu-Fucking-nny!
Though that is but one aspect of controversy in this film, there is also the issue of the portrayal of the mentally handicapped. Specifically the fictional character of Simple Jack in the fictional film within the film 'Simple Jack' as Exhibit A. Stiller's character plays Simple Jack, a mentally challenged stable boy trying to prove himself, but Stiller plays Jack in such a ridiculous over the top insane way, how anyone can take this serious is beyond me.
Exhibit B is the conversation between Stiller and Downey regarding the film and character Simple Jack, wherein they discuss motivations of playing someone mentally handicapped and the fact that if you want to win an award for playing a mentally challenged individual you should never play someone who is fully mentally retarded. (Retarded in this case being a medical term) As Downey's character puts it, "Never go full retard." He explains that doing this will never get you an award. He further explains the reason behind this being that the audience finds a performance like this somewhat distracting, and playing someone slightly mentally challenged but of a higher functionally allows you to make an emotional connection with the audience and they can enjoy the performance more.
Critics see these exhibits as I'm not sure what exactly. "It will make people use the terms retarded or retard as an insult." I'm pretty sure people already do that, you retards. Oops. But seriously, retard is the same as the word nigger? Are you fucking kidding me!? Tropic Thunder is a big crazy fucked up comedy, a parody that is blatantly offensive. If you've heard the evils and you think you won't like it don't go, leave it alone. Complain all you want that's what democracy is for but don't try to destroy something just because you disagree with it. What is this a fucking Neo-Nazi propaganda film? Fuck off! If they did shit like this on an episode of South Park nobody would bat an eye.
Anyways back to the film itself. Overall the film is entertaining, at times it isn't really sure what kind of movie it wants to be, it never really delves right into action territory, it switches back and forth between different subplots at random a few times, but there is rarely a dull moment and there is some damn funky dancing.
"Did you cry when you got your hands blown off?"
Tropic Thunder a solid 8/10
(These ratings don't mean all that much usual there are three main categories for movies with me the worst being Shit, the mid range being Mediocre and the awesome range being Awesome.)
So there you have it two reviews for the price of none.
'Til we meet again.











